101 . Newhagen , John Elizabeth. , “Beyond mind-report: Playing with latency to resolve model issue reacting process on the web-established public opinion surveys,” regarding Sourcebook for Political Interaction Lookup , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you may Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Google Beginner
102 . Oxley , Douglas R. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John R. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and Hibbing , John Roentgen. , “Political perceptions are different that have psychological characteristics,” Science , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Are feminine likely to choose to own women’s affairs expense than simply their men acquaintances?” Legislative Training CupiDates recenzije Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Feminine Build: The policy Effect of women during the Congress ( il : College regarding Chicago Press , 2002 ).Google Student
105 . Hill , Kim Quaile and you will Hurley , Patricia Good. , “A symbol speeches on the You.S. Senate in addition to their representational ramifications,” Record out of Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner
108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Would be to blacks represent blacks and feminine show female? An effective contingent ‘yes’,” Record regarding Government 1999 , 61 ( step 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil
109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-associated political training therefore the detailed logo of women,” Governmental Conclusion 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil
110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Is there a good ‘gender attraction effect’ inside the American government? S. House elections,” Governmental Browse Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle College student
This particular article could have been cited of the adopting the publications. Which list is made according to research available with Crossref.
Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney Good. and you may Lust, Ellen 2015. Is-it Gender, Religiosity otherwise Each other? A task Congruity Principle from Applicant Electability in the Transformation Tunisia. Viewpoints to your Government, Vol. thirteen, Matter. step 1, p. 74.
Bauer, Nichole Meters. 2015. Whom stereotypes feminine individuals? Distinguishing personal variations in women label reliance. Government, Teams, and you may Identities, Vol. step 3, Topic. 1, p. 94.
Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The character of gender from inside the detailed icon,” Governmental Search Every quarter 1995 , 48 : 599 – 611
McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Younger Mie Knisely, Sandra and you will McLeod, Douglas 2015. Whenever feminine assault. Government and the Lifetime Sciences, Vol. 34, Matter. 1, p. 44.
Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you may Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Delivering mixed signals: the role from gender and you may partisanship in feedback out-of political leaders. Diary away from Elections, Public opinion and you will Parties, Vol. twenty six, Point. cuatro, p. 423.
Koch, Thomas and you will Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. With Cardiovascular system and you can (No) Notice? Just how Receiver Adversely Infer Lost Information regarding Political leaders and exactly how So it Affects the brand new Research of the Speakermunication Research, Vol. 43, Topic. seven, p. 972.
Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Determining Thinking out-of Female People in politics: The situation from Poland. Government during the Main Europe, Vol. 14, Thing. step 3, p. seven.
Schneider, Monica C. and you may Bos, Angela L. 2019. The aid of Personal Character Idea with the Study of Gender inside the Politics. Political Therapy, Vol. 40, Thing. S1, p. 173.
Park, Sunrays Young and Baek, Young Minute 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence to the Women Political figures: As to why Ambivalence Issues for Gender Equality into the a Democracy. Log of women, Government & Plan, Vol. forty, Procedure. dos, p. 309.
Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Character Murder and you may Ladies in Politics. Corvinus Log off Globally Things, Vol. 4, Material. 1, p. fifteen.
Aaldering, Loes and you may Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Frontrunners regarding Media: Gender Bias in the Frontrunner Stereotypes throughout the Campaign and you may Program Moments. United kingdom Diary away from Governmental Technology, Vol. fifty, Point. step three, p. 911.
Boer, Noortje 2020. Just how do Residents Determine Street?Peak Bureaucrats’ Passion and you can Proficiency? A Typology and you may Test. Social Administration Comment, Vol. 80, Material. 4, p. 532.